Temperature in AI Prompts: The Hidden Setting That Changes Everything

I spent three weeks trying to get consistent AI outputs before someone told me about temperature.

I'd run the same prompt twice and get completely different results. Great for brainstorming, terrible for anything that needed to be consistent.

Turns out there's a setting that controls this. It's called temperature.

And once I understood how to use it, my AI results improved massively.

What Temperature Actually Is

When AI generates text, it doesn't just pick the "best" next word. It picks from a probability distribution of possible words.

Temperature controls how wild or conservative those choices are.

Think of it like this:

Low temperature (0-0.3): AI plays it safe, picks the most likely words Medium temperature (0.4-0.7): AI balances likely and interesting choices High temperature (0.8-2.0): AI takes risks, explores unlikely options

Here's a real example. I asked Claude to complete: "The best way to start a business is..."

At temperature 0.2: "The best way to start a business is to identify a problem in the market and develop a solution."

At temperature 0.7: "The best way to start a business is to find something you're passionate about and test it with real customers quickly."

At temperature 1.5: "The best way to start a business is to throw your hat over the wall and chase after it before fear catches up."

Same prompt. Completely different outputs.

The low temperature gave me generic business advice. The high temperature gave me something memorable (and a bit risky).

Neither is "wrong." They're useful for different situations.

When to Use Low Temperature (0-0.3)

Use this when you need consistency and reliability.

Good for:

• Code generation
• Data extraction
• Factual summaries
• Anything where there's a "right" answer
• Outputs you'll parse programmatically

Example prompt:

Extract the following information from this email:
- Sender name
- Main request
- Deadline
- Priority level

Email: [paste email]

Format as JSON.

You want the exact same structure every time. Low temperature.

I use temperature 0.2 for anything that feeds into automation or needs to run reliably.

Last week I built a script that extracts action items from meeting notes. At high temperature, it would sometimes add creative interpretations. At low temperature, it just pulls what's actually there.

That's what I wanted.

When to Use Medium Temperature (0.4-0.7)

This is the default for most AI tools, and for good reason.

Good for:

• Writing (emails, blog posts, marketing copy)
• General conversation
• Balanced brainstorming
• Advice and recommendations

Example prompt:

Write an email to our customers announcing our new feature.

Key points:
- Launches next week
- Solves the [problem] they've asked about
- Free for all existing customers
- Link to docs

Tone: Excited but professional

You want it to sound natural and engaging, but not weird. Medium temperature.

This is where I spend most of my time. It's creative enough to sound human, consistent enough to be reliable.

When I write emails or content, I stick to 0.6-0.7. Gets me interesting phrasing without going off the rails.

When to Use High Temperature (0.8+)

Use this when you want the AI to surprise you.

Good for:

• Creative brainstorming
• Generating diverse options
• Breaking out of conventional thinking
• Fiction writing
• Exploring edge cases

Example prompt:

Generate 10 completely different headline approaches for a productivity app.

Don't just rephrase the same idea. Give me genuinely different angles:
- Emotional
- Data-driven
- Contrarian
- Funny
- Aspirational
- etc.

Be bold.

At high temperature, you'll get wilder variations. Some will be brilliant, some will be unusable. That's the point.

I use temperature 1.2-1.5 when I'm stuck and need fresh perspectives.

Last month I was writing a landing page and everything sounded the same. I cranked temperature to 1.4 and asked for 20 headline variations.

Most were too weird. But three were genuinely interesting angles I wouldn't have thought of. I refined those at medium temperature.

That's the workflow: High temperature for exploration, medium temperature for execution.

How Temperature Interacts with Prompts

Here's what I've learned: Temperature and prompt specificity work together.

Specific prompt + Low temperature = Extremely consistent Good for: Code, data extraction, formatting

Specific prompt + High temperature = Controlled creativity Good for: Multiple variations of a defined thing

Vague prompt + Low temperature = Generic and boring Problem: You get the most common, safest answer

Vague prompt + High temperature = Chaotic mess Problem: AI has too much freedom, results are all over the place

The trick is matching them correctly.

If I want creative copy, I use a specific prompt (define tone, audience, key points) at medium-high temperature.

If I want consistent data extraction, I use a specific format at low temperature.

If I want brainstorming, I use open-ended prompts at high temperature.

Real Examples from My Work

Code Generation (Temperature 0.1)

Write a Python function that validates email addresses.

Requirements:
- Use regex pattern
- Return boolean
- Handle None values
- Include docstring

Code only, no explanation.

At temp 0.1, I get the same basic implementation every time. That's what I want for code—the most standard, widely-accepted pattern.

Email Writing (Temperature 0.6)

Write a follow-up email to a prospect who went dark after our demo.

Context: They seemed interested, asked good questions, but haven't responded in 2 weeks.

Tone: Friendly, not pushy. Acknowledge they're busy.
Add value, don't just check in.

Length: 3-4 sentences max.

At temp 0.6, I get natural-sounding emails that vary slightly each time but stay on message.

Perfect for when I need to send similar but not identical emails to different people.

Brainstorming (Temperature 1.3)

I need content ideas for a project management tool blog.

Give me 15 completely different angles. Not just variations on "how to manage projects better."

Think: Unconventional use cases, counterintuitive advice, specific niches, emotional angles, data-driven posts, storytelling approaches.

Surprise me.

At temp 1.3, I get wild ideas. Maybe 5 are usable, but those 5 are genuinely creative.

At lower temperature, I'd get "10 Project Management Tips" fifteen different ways.

Content Refinement (Temperature 0.3)

Improve the clarity of this paragraph without changing the meaning:

[paste paragraph]

Make it:
- More concise
- Easier to scan
- Clearer logic flow

Keep the same general structure.

At temp 0.3, it tightens the writing without reimagining it.

Higher temperature might creatively rewrite it. Lower is more conservative about changes.

Model-Specific Differences

Different AI models handle temperature differently.

ChatGPT (GPT-4):

• Default is usually 0.7
• Handles high temperature (1.0+) well
• Very creative at 1.2-1.5
• Can get incoherent above 1.8

Claude:

• Tends to be more conservative even at high temperature
• I usually go 0.1 higher than I would with GPT-4
• Excellent at maintaining coherence even at 1.5+
• Better for creative writing at high temperature

Midjourney/Image Generation:

• Uses different parameters but similar concept
• "Chaos" parameter is like temperature
• Low chaos = consistent, predictable
• High chaos = experimental, varied

APIs and Custom Implementations:

• Many tools let you set temperature directly
• Range is typically 0-2
• Some models cap it at 1.0
• Test to find what works for your specific model

I keep notes on which temperatures work best for which models and tasks.

Common Mistakes

Mistake 1: Using default temperature for everything

Most tools default to 0.7-0.8. That's okay for chat, not optimized for specific tasks.

I explicitly set temperature based on what I'm doing.

Mistake 2: Using high temperature for factual tasks

I've seen people generate code or extract data at high temperature. The results are inconsistent and sometimes just wrong.

If there's a correct answer, use low temperature.

Mistake 3: Using low temperature for creative work

Your brainstorming outputs will be boring. Everything will sound the same.

When I want creativity, I explicitly bump temperature.

Mistake 4: Not testing the range

Most people never experiment. They use whatever the default is.

I spent a day testing different temperatures for my common tasks. Now I know exactly what to use when.

Mistake 5: Forgetting temperature is just one factor

Temperature doesn't fix bad prompts. A vague prompt at perfect temperature still gives vague results.

Focus on prompt quality first, then tune temperature.

How to Find Your Perfect Temperature

Here's what I did:

1. Pick a common task (for me: writing email copy)
2. Write a good prompt for it
3. Run it at 0.2, 0.5, 0.8, 1.2
4. Compare the outputs
5. Note which temperature gave the best results

Then do this for 5-6 of your most common use cases.

After a week, you'll have a mental model of what temperature to use when.

My actual notes look like:

Code generation: 0.1-0.2
Data extraction: 0.2
Email writing: 0.6
Blog posts: 0.7
Brainstorming: 1.2-1.4
Creative headlines: 1.3
Editing/refinement: 0.3-0.4
Analysis/research: 0.5

Your numbers might be different. But having the reference makes you way more effective.

Advanced: Combining Temperature Changes

Sometimes I'll use multiple temperatures in one workflow.

Example: Content Creation

1. High temperature (1.3): Generate 10 different angles
2. Medium temperature (0.7): Develop the best 3 angles into outlines
3. Low temperature (0.4): Refine and polish the best outline

This gives me creative options upfront, then progressively more consistency as I execute.

Example: Code Development

1. Medium temperature (0.6): Discuss architecture approach
2. Low temperature (0.2): Generate the actual code
3. Medium temperature (0.6): Generate tests
4. Low temperature (0.2): Generate documentation

Different phases need different levels of creativity.

Tools That Expose Temperature

Not all interfaces let you control temperature directly.

Can control:

• OpenAI API (set temp parameter)
• Anthropic API (Claude API)
• Most chatbot UIs with "advanced settings"
• Custom implementations
• Some UI tools like Boost Prompt

Can't easily control:

• ChatGPT web interface (uses defaults)
• Many consumer AI apps
• Embedded AI features in other tools

If your tool doesn't expose temperature, you can sometimes approximate it with prompts:

For lower temperature effect:

Give me the most standard, common approach to [task].

For higher temperature effect:

Give me creative, unconventional approaches to [task]. Be bold.

Not perfect, but better than nothing.

The Bigger Picture

Temperature is one of those things that separates casual AI users from people who get consistently great results.

It's not complicated. It's just a number from 0 to 2.

But knowing when to use 0.2 vs 0.7 vs 1.4 makes a massive difference.

Most people never learn this. They wonder why AI sometimes gives great results and sometimes disappointing ones.

The AI isn't inconsistent. They're just not controlling consistency vs creativity.

Getting Started

If you want to start using temperature effectively:

1. Identify your 3 most common AI use cases
2. For each, decide: Do I need consistency or creativity?
3. Consistency → Start at 0.2-0.3
4. Balanced → Start at 0.6-0.7
5. Creativity → Start at 1.2-1.4
6. Test and refine from there

Within a few days, you'll develop intuition.

And your AI outputs will get noticeably more useful.

---

Temperature works best when combined with solid prompting technique. Check out our guide on types of prompts to understand when to use different approaches.

For creative work specifically, combining high temperature with few-shot prompting gives you controlled creativity—the best of both worlds.

And if you're using different AI models, our Claude vs GPT-4 comparison covers how temperature behaves differently across models.

For image generation, temperature concepts apply differently—read our guide on Midjourney prompting to learn how chaos and other parameters work.